When we take on someone's burdens, we don't relieve the person of them; instead, the burden is duplicated. That person—or soul—has chosen such experiences, and we cannot take that experience away by taking part of it onto ourselves.

 

Also, by interfering with free will, we prevent the person from connecting with the Source, because the Source now allows us to experience taking on His role and steps aside, and the person chooses to entrust us with burdens rather than surrender, being proactive outwardly yet surrendered to the Source.

 

As the Source withdraws, we enter synthetic realities in this way, and the person hands over their power to us; the person is helpless and we will solve their problems, and thus a parasitic relationship is created where the person relinquishes their own responsibility and power (the karma remains but is additionally duplicated because the “creator” who is helping takes on the person's burden and the soul contracts that already exist in the person who is surrendering power and responsibility are duplicated).

 

In various types of “initiations,” the teacher takes on the student's karma; at least that's how the traditions explain it. But the reality is that he only duplicates the soul contracts and the karma a person has, because he consciously agreed to bear the person's burdens—something only the Source can do.

The Source agrees to a one-to-one relationship: Source and soul.

 

~Wandian & Elysia